tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5687347459208158501.post2414086047615974549..comments2024-03-29T03:19:09.227-04:00Comments on The Philosopher's Stone: A REPLY TO TIMRobert Paul Wolffhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11970360952872431856noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5687347459208158501.post-62921713072254244782014-11-02T10:39:30.998-05:002014-11-02T10:39:30.998-05:00I appreciate you taking the time to reply, thanks!...I appreciate you taking the time to reply, thanks!<br /><br />Timhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12701518449890533724noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5687347459208158501.post-54551568704601962712014-11-01T04:50:15.670-04:002014-11-01T04:50:15.670-04:00I am not aware that they are, but I really am not ...I am not aware that they are, but I really am not up on that literature.Robert Paul Wolffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11970360952872431856noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5687347459208158501.post-8743135229959756702014-11-01T02:33:58.728-04:002014-11-01T02:33:58.728-04:00Are Kant's views on property considered as or ...Are Kant's views on property considered as or used as a critique of Locke's?Jerry Fresiahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01427077490696059928noreply@blogger.com