tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5687347459208158501.post3032078491166469241..comments2024-03-28T15:48:11.151-04:00Comments on The Philosopher's Stone: MARX AND FREUDRobert Paul Wolffhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11970360952872431856noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5687347459208158501.post-29237498331126821852014-10-10T12:38:22.455-04:002014-10-10T12:38:22.455-04:00Just wondering, why is it that when it comes time ...Just wondering, why is it that when it comes time for Marx to write about the illusions of life in a society dominated by production for the purpose of exchange, he has to write ironically, that is, given the ontology of his object, but when Freud is confronted with the task of writing about the illusions of life with an unconscious, he writes like the envy of the enlightenment? What's with the ontology of Freud's object that he is not burdened in the way that Marx was? Or, is it that there is something up with Freud's writing too?Andrew Lionel Blaishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01976034095806583387noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5687347459208158501.post-1019048817538705662014-10-09T10:31:55.002-04:002014-10-09T10:31:55.002-04:00Thank you. I've had the Marcuse book garnering...Thank you. I've had the Marcuse book garnering dust in my storage closet for some time. I suppose it's time to give it a read.Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08250295324149056708noreply@blogger.com