tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5687347459208158501.post2465608018643773221..comments2024-03-28T15:48:11.151-04:00Comments on The Philosopher's Stone: WHAT I HAVE BEEN DOING -- PART FIVERobert Paul Wolffhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11970360952872431856noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5687347459208158501.post-85510792350425291452013-02-08T10:24:05.971-05:002013-02-08T10:24:05.971-05:00No complaints. I understand perfectly. Really grea...No complaints. I understand perfectly. Really great posts.Matias Vernengohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09521604894748538215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5687347459208158501.post-59190284921350403982013-02-07T11:49:42.708-05:002013-02-07T11:49:42.708-05:00Okay. I am trying desperately to keep this as sim...Okay. I am trying desperately to keep this as simple as I can, but you are right.Robert Paul Wolffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11970360952872431856noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5687347459208158501.post-36409587230464785312013-02-07T09:38:02.131-05:002013-02-07T09:38:02.131-05:00Great post, or series of posts I should say. Just ...Great post, or series of posts I should say. Just one thing, in fact, part of what the capital debates of the 1960s did show is that one cannot say whether a productive process is capital intensive or labor intensive, since there is a possibility of reswitching and reverse capital deepening. I would suggest that it would be more appropriatte to say that there are processes with different proportions of labor to means of production. Sraffa in fact avoided the use of the term capital prefering always to use means of production.Matias Vernengohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09521604894748538215noreply@blogger.com