It being Sunday,
I have been spending a little time with the Good Book. It has been a while since I re-read Genesis, so I started at the beginning. As you will recall, it takes God a chapter to
create the world, and another chapter to create Adam and Eve, but scarcely have
we made our way two pages into the King
James version when things start to go downhill. The serpent shows up in chapter 3, and sex
rears its ugly head in chapter 4,
with the birth first of Cain [verse 1] and Abel [verse 2]. It is an old and ugly story. The Lord prefers Abel's sacrifice of a sheep
to Cain's offer of grain [this is long before the advent of vegetarianism],
angering Cain so much that he up and slays Abel, whereupon the Lord curses
Cain. Cain is weighed down by the curse,
and expresses to the Lord his fear that "every one that findeth me shall
slay me," [chapter 4], so God, taking pity, I guess, puts upon him a mark
[the mark of Cain, as it came to be called], "lest any finding him should
kill him."
It is just
about here, barely three pages into a Book that, in my edition, runs to 918
pages [not War and Peace, to be sure,
but not The Great Gatsby either],
that I begin to have doubts about this being the inerrant Word of the
Lord. I mean, whom is Cain afraid
of? At this point, only four people have
come into the world, two by divine creation and two by birth, and one of them
is dead. Although it requires us to
engage in a soupҫon of
lit crit, I think the text makes it pretty clear that Cain is not fearful of
being killed by Adam or Eve. Besides, while we are still in chapter 4 [verses
16-17], Cain leaves Eden and sets up light housekeeping east of Eden in the
land of Nod where he "knew his wife" who "conceived, and bare
Enoch," so pleasing Cain that "he builded a city, and called the name
of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch."As Spencer Tracy asks Frederic March in the great courtroom scene from Inherit the Wind, where on earth did Cain's wife come from? At this point, the only woman in the world, according to Inerrantist Fundamentalists, is Eve, and I think we have to assume that Cain did not "know" Eve, who was, after all, his mother, and is living in Eden, not Nod.
All right. So much for the cheap shots. There is nothing even faintly original in
this snarking. But look, in the United
States today, we are routinely asked to take seriously grown men and women who
believe this nonsense. They control the
choice of textbooks in Texas, and have taken to writing vicious anti-women laws
in a score of states, all as an expression of their deep faith in The Word,
which we atheists and agnostics and rational people are supposed to respect and
treat with great courtesy.
Now I take a back seat to no man or
woman in my love and admiration for the King
James version as a great work of literary art. I expect my students to read it, and as this
post makes clear, I recur to it repeatedly.
But the time has come for all of us who are even halfway educated to
just say, Enough! Keep your childhood
fantasies and bedtime stories to yourselves and don't try to foist them on the
rest of us.
Tomorrow, if I have time after
returning from Bennett College, I will have a few choice words to say about Ayn
Rand, who is the inspiration not only for the Chairman of the Fed who gave us
the present Depression but also for the newly anointed presumptive Republican
nominee for the Vice-Presidency.
1 comment:
And, even though God created the human race, and was happy about it, in ch. 1, the first human was created later on, in ch. 2, regarding which God was a bit peeved. Yeah, I know, biblical 'paradoxes'.
Speaking of Theology, note that Ryan threw Ayn Rand under the bus when he realized that her Atheism might prove difficult to sell to the Religious Right. As if wanting to get into Heaven were not consistent with Selfishness. Anyway, if Ryan is a 'game-changer', why such a cliche to describe him?
Post a Comment