Some
folks from several Duke University departments have organized something that
they call "The Political Theory Working Group." They meet regularly throughout the year and
then hold a two day conference in the Spring.
One of the organizers, Michael Gillespie, recently invited me to speak
at this year's conference, in April. I
was, needless to say, flattered by the invitation, and my initial inclination
was to agree. But then he told me
something of what they have been focusing on, and I started to have
doubts. "This year's theme for the
conference," he wrote to me in an email message, "is 'Community and
Emergent Order in Non-State Spaces: Cinematic, Literary, and Philosophical
Approaches.'" Right away, I began
to have qualms. What on earth do I know
about cinematic, literary, and philosophical approaches to community and
emergent order in non-state spaces?
My doubts
morphed into dismay when Gillespie told me what the group has been up to this
year. " Over the course of the
academic year, the Working Group will have watched a dozen films/TV episodes
that have been paired with theoretical and philosophic readings dealing
directly or indirectly with non-state spaces: The Wild Bunch & Deadwood
(readings by you and from Anderson and Hill's The Not So Wild Wild West);
Hotel Rwanda & The Battle of Algiers (readings from Fanon and
Thucydides); Serenity & Avatar (readings from Rousseau's Second
Discourse and James C Scott's The Art of Not Being Governed); The
Godfather & The Wire (readings from Hobbes's Leviathan and Franz
Oppenheimer's The State); The Bridge on the River Quai & One Flew
Over the Cuckoo's Nest (readings from R. A. Radford on the "Economic
Organization of the Prison Camp" and from Szasz's The Myth of Mental
Illness); Rabbit-Proof Fence and Beasts of the Southern Wild
(readings yet to be determined, but likely from Pierre Clastres and Rebecca
Solnit)."
Readings
by me in conjunction with The Wild Bunch
and Deadwood? I had to Google them to find out what they
are. [One is a Sam Peckinpah movie from
1969. The other is a TV show.] It was obvious that I was way out of my
league. What on earth could I possibly
talk about that would have the slightest connection to this kind of sophisticated
kulturkritik?
I demurred,
Gillespie said all manner of kind things to reassure me, and I finally allowed
as how I wanted to talk about the relationship between language and social
reality in Marx, with my remarks touching on economics, linear algebra, literary
criticism, and commodity fetishism.
"Swell," he said, and I was well and truly sunk.
For my
entire career, my worst nightmare has been standing up at a lectern and droning
on about something the audience really does not want to hear. Only several times in the past fifty or sixty
years has that nightmare come true. Once
was at the University of Maryland Baltimore County, where I presented myself to
deliver an invited lecture, only to find the large hall in which I was to speak
deserted save for a scattering of perhaps eleven souls, five or so of whom got
up in the middle of the talk and walked out.
It was not until after the disaster was ended that my hosts explained: It seems that the Baltimore Colts were
playing a crucial game at precisely the hour of my talk, and it was, they said
soothingly, a testimony to my star quality that anybody at all had shown up.
What am I
going to say, come April? Well, I am
going to pull together a number of things I have written about Capital, in two books and several
articles, and try to explain in forty-five minutes what I mean when I say that Marx
needed to find a language and a mathematics sufficiently rich in syntactic and
rhetorical resources to give expression to his complex understanding of
capitalist social and economic reality. Are there "cinematic approaches"
that can be paired with this talk? Maybe
Charlie Chaplin's Modern Times [which
I have not actually seen straight through], or the famous episode of I Love Lucy in which Lucille Ball
struggles to keep up with a conveyor belt in a cake factory.
Something
tells me this is going to be another disaster, on a par with the UMBC fiasco.
Well, the writers of Deadwood had to invent a new language rich in cursewords and racial epithets to give expression to the savage anarchy of 1860s South Dakota. Clear parallel.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI suggest renting Deadwood and watching maybe the first season. It's not very many episodes, and it may have more to do with your work than you think. I say this not only as a fan of the show but also as a fan of your work.
ReplyDeleteWell, I am always looking for something to watch. I will give it a try.
ReplyDeleteYou might also give the show "Firefly" a shot. It's what the film "Serenity" is based on. The premise is that humans have started to colonize other planets, but a rebel group, tired of being governed, decides to try to get independence. It's a sci-fi western, mostly because "settling other planets" really turns out to look a lot like the American Frontier.
ReplyDelete