One of the much touted virtues of capitalism is that it
dissolves all ancient feuds, religious passions, and ideological antagonisms
into the cash nexus. The entrepreneur
cannot afford to yield to irrational antipathies because the object of his
obloquy today may be a customer tomorrow.
Here in the United States, we associate this capitalist temperament with
the hale fellow well met hearty false cheerfulness of the Mid-Western
businessman. I first encountered the
phenomenon on the occasion of the wedding of my first wife's young brother. Cynthia's father was a successful Sears
Roebuck executive who, during her teenage years, ran the Cleveland group of
Sears stores. Jim Griffin was what might
be called a political Catholic. I never
was able to figure out whether he had any genuine religious beliefs, but he
raised enough money for the church to be made a Knight of Malta by the Pope,
sat on the Board of John Carroll
University, and at one point was Chair of the National Catholic Boy Scouts of
America. My marriage to Cynthia was, as
they used to say in the old days, a scandal to the faithful, and many of
Griffin's Catholic business friends cut him dead for a while because of it
[thereby revealing that they had not entirely internalized the capitalist
ethos.]
But Cynthia's brother was marrying in the church, and so we
all gathered in Shaker Heights for the wedding.
[Griffin had to get a special dispensation at the downtown club to which
he belonged to bring a Jew along for the rehearsal dinner.] Now, I knew that the people I would be
meeting had shunned Griffin for a while because of me, so I was uncertain what
sort of reception I would get, but I was determined to behave myself and not
embarras Cynthia, putting on my Sunday go to meeting smile for the
reception. Despite my preparations, I
was completely unprepared for the treatment I received. People who considered me one generation from
having horns came up to me, took my hand in both of theirs, and said with
oleaginous sincerity, "Oh, Bob, I am so glad to meet you. I have looked forward to this for such a long
time." I was completely inadequate
to the occasion, and never managed to get more than a strangled "Please to
meet you" out of my mouth.
But we radicals, having rejected capitalism on high
ideological grounds, are free from such social hypocrisy. Indeed, the besetting sin of those of us on the
left is a tendency to hold grudges over matters of principle for days, weeks,
or even decades. Freud's wonderful
phrase, "the narcissism of small differences," perfectly captures our
ability to convert minor disagreements about subordinate theoretical matters
into lifelong feuds.
All of this flashed through my mind as I sat in the Carolina
Cafe eating my lemon poppy seed muffin and doing the NY TIMES crossword
puzzle. Because the Monday puzzle is
dead easy, I finished it long before I had eaten my muffin, and my eye caught a
story at the top of Page 3 of the Arts section where the puzzle was located. It seems that Dissent Magazine is celebrating its sixtieth anniversary, and the
story about the gathering at the New York headquarters of the American
Federation of Teachers was headed by a photograph of the celebrants, one of
whom was Michael Walzer. Walzer, as
readers of this blog no doubt are aware, is a famous political theorist,
Professor at the Princeton Institute for Advanced Study, and long-time
co-editor of Dissent.
Mike and I were friends back in '59 to '61, when I was a
young Instructor at Harvard and he was a grad student in the Government
Department. But a dozen years later,
during the Nixon impeachment days, Mike chose to support Nixon because Nixon
was a good friend of Israel. That caused
a breach that has lasted another forty years.
Maybe I should practice a firm two-handed handshake and a cheery
smile. I mean, do I really want to take
all of that to my grave?
Professor Wolff,
ReplyDeleteEven though this is not related to this entry, but I was wondering if you've had a chance to see the film '12 Years A Slave,' and if you did, what your reaction was.
No, I haven't. I don't think it is playing in the local theaters.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure you've dealt with this in your memoirs, but I am interested in the evidentiary basis (as the lawyers would say) for your statement that Walzer supported Nixon during the impeachment proceedings.
ReplyDeleteLFC: It's in the ninth installment of his Memoirs.
ReplyDeleteProfessor,
ReplyDeleteThere are members of my own family whom I have not spoken to for years. Just because I am getting older and they are entering what will most likely be the last few years of their lives does not make me want to extend an olive branch; an egregious little twerp will always be just that.
And besides, age brings increasing intolerance; or so I am finding with myself.
I've asked your advice in e mails countless times, and now this time as a cyber friend of longstanding, I offer my advice-leave it be, plain and simple.
You are right, of course, you are right. So I will take your advice and say no more about it. Perhaps in time I will acquire sufficient wisdom also not to think about it. It is now less than two months until my eightieth birthday, and that would be a good personal resolution for that signal milestone.
ReplyDeleteMeanwhile, continue doing brilliantly at university!
Thanks for encouragement Professor
ReplyDeleteCurrently working on assignment 'Were the customs duties on overseas trade administered efficiently in early modern Scotland?'
And I just see smugglers everywhere-most of them issuing cocket tickets :-(