Now that I am on a diet, I face the challenge each evening
when I make dinner of somehow fooling my stomach into believing that it is
eating food. Last night, I scored a signal success. I sliced a large Vidalia onion very thin,
added to it a large red bell pepper julienned, and with nothing more than a bit
of spray olive oil to keep the pan from sticking, sautéed it forever until the onion and the pepper all but
melted, giving up their natural [non-fattening] sugars. It was delicious! As I lingered over the dish, my mind turned
to fire [we have a gas stove]. I began
to wonder about the extraordinary range of practical information that is
presupposed by the simple act of cooking dinner. [I have the feeling I am channeling Claude
Levi-Strauss, but that is neither here nor there.]
Think about how many different and not at all intuitively
obvious bits of knowledge someone must have to get the idea of making a fire
and cooking food. Let us start with
fire. Early humans [and pre-hominids as
well, as they are called] "had fire," as the saying goes. Where did they get it from? Almost certainly, Jane Neanderthal, as we may
refer to her, first saw fire when lightning strikes sparked conflagrations in dry
forests or grasslands. She and her fellow
Neanderthal probably noticed four things about this strange phenomenon: it was hot, it was bright and shiny and
flickering, it scared away animals, even large and dangerous animals, and it
hurt if you touched it. How long [and
how many times] did it take before someone had the idea of picking up a burning
stick and waving it to scare animals?
How much longer before someone discovered that you could bring a burning
stick back to your cave or camp and use it to light other sticks, creating a
stable fire? [This simple fact, which is
obvious to all of us, actually involves a number of conceptual leaps]. How much longer did it take to discover that
in getting a fire going from a glowing ember or a slowly burning bit of wood,
you must gather twigs and bark and little bits of wood first before throwing on
the logs? How much longer again to
discover that a glowing ember can be carried from campsite to campsite and used
to re-created a fire? And, the very
biggest leap thus far, by what act of inventive genius did someone discover
that one could create new fire by
striking flints against one another?
[Not just any two stones, but flint stones.] We are not yet anywhere near the idea of
cooked food, and already we have an enormous fund of collective knowledge, much
of it presumably discovered and rediscovered countless times in countless
places over a period of a million years.
It is possible to imagine how the idea of cooking meat was
discovered. [As I talk about the
discovery of facts that all of us so much take for granted that we find it hard
to conceive of them as having ever been discovered,
I am reminded of a lovely moment in the John Travolta film, Michael.
Travolta plays a rather overweight angel come to Earth, where he does
this, that, and the other with Andie MacDowell, William Hurt, and Bob Hoskins. Travolta (the angel Michael) remarks in
passing that he invented standing in line.
Up 'til then, everyone just bunched up and crowded around. The charm of the line lies in our sudden
realization that standing in line, like every other social act, must have been invented at some time or other.] But back to cooking. An animal laid low by the fire and partially
burned would be a tasty bit of food for a hungry band of early humans wandering
the savannah, and it might occur to them to take freshly killed prey and put it
on the fire. But how did anyone think up
the idea of taking a gourd used to carry water, putting it on the fire, boiling
water in it, and then cooking plants and nuts and bits of grain in it to make
soup?
Looking backwards, we understand the great advantageous of
cooked food. Cooking breaks plant
materials and flesh down, making them digestible. The advent of cooking enormously expands the
range of possible foods, never mind the improved taste.
All of this, and a great deal more, flashed through my mind
as I lingered over the onion and pepper dish I had created. It struck me as a very powerful example of
the deep truth set forth in the first
paragraph of the Credo that I wrote and posted on this blog a long time ago:
"We human beings live
in this world by thoughtfully, purposefully, intelligently transforming nature
so that it will satisfy our needs and our desires. We call this activity of
transforming nature "production," and it is always, everywhere, inescapably
a collective human activity. Every moment that we are alive we are relying on
what those before us have discovered or invented or devised. There is no
technique, however primitive, that is the invention of one person alone. Like
it or not, we are all in this life together. Even those giants of industry who
think of themselves as self-made men are completely dependent for their empire
building upon the collective knowledge and practice of the entire human
species."
3 comments:
Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human
by Richard Wrangham
You're getting close to Oakeshott's defense of conservatism there.
There has always been much in Oakeshott that I admire and with which I agree. But if you look at it closely, it does not entail or even provide support for his Tory politics. That is a long interesting matter.
Post a Comment