Now that I have settled into the blogosphere and looked
around to see what other bloggers are doing, it has struck me that what I do is
really rather unusual. Indeed, it may
very well be unique. Would any other
blogger post a nineteen part essay on the thought of Karl Marx, or a fourteen
part essay on the thought of Sigmund Freud, not to speak of a sixteen part
essay on Ideological Critique, or a 261,696 word autobiography presented almost
daily for fourteen months? Logorrhea does not begin to capture it.
I know, from comments and emails, that the blog reaches at
least six continents [no news from Antarctica as yet]. I cannot figure out how many people follow it
more or less regularly, but it seems to be somewhere between one and three thousand. Periodically Brian Leiter links to the blog
and page views spike dramatically for a day or two [Leiter really is a successful blogger -- heaven only
knows how many page views he gets.]
But you never know.
When I went back a second time to see the very nice bi-lingual Paris
doctor I found on rue de Pot de Fer, she told me her daughter had called her
attention to the nice things I had said about her on my blog. And considering that Piketty's translator,
Arthur Goldhammer, recently posted a comment, I flatter myself that just
possibly Piketty himself took a look at my five part review. [I mean, he watches Desperate Housewives, judging from a reference in his book, why not
me?]
As I have observed before, it is like having a large
permanent class, in which I lecture every day to a shifting assemblage of
scholars, students, artists, and free-form intellectuals. [I am reminded of the great line from a song
in Guys and Dolls -- "It's the
oldest established permanent floating crap game in New York."] I may not reach as many people as Arianna Huffington,
but I would bet you the average I.Q. of
my readers is higher.
By the time I am ninety, I may hit three million. Of course, by then, people will be reading
this on their eyeglasses.
Congrats, Prof! As you have said before, the quality of the discussions going on in this blog is incredible. Even though I don't often contribute, I enjoy every last bit.
ReplyDeleteJust one thing, though: please, oh please don't use IQ as a measure of intelligence. Even though it might have been tongue in cheek. I just think it's a terribly stupid and misleading way of measuring something whose nature isn't even clear. So much so that we tend to think of it as innate, but it turns out to be extremely dependent on all sorts of external factors.
I know, I know, it was a jest. But you are quite right of course.
ReplyDelete