I was much enamored of the King Arthur legend as a boy. One of my favorite books was The Sword in the Stone by T. H. White,
first published in 1938 and later incorporated into White’s full scale
retelling of the legend, The Once and
Future King [readers of my Autobiography may recall that I took the title
of Book Three from White’s novel.] The Sword in the Stone tells the story
of Arthur’s youth and preparation for kingship.
As White imagines it, the young Arthur [nicknamed Wart] is taken in hand
by the wizard Merlin, who, since he lives backwards in time, is aware that Wart
is destined to become king. In order to
be a good king, Wart must learn to see the world in many ways, so Merlin
changes him into an eagle, an ant, and a badger, among other animals, each of
which has a distinctive characterological strength. Merlin even turns Wart into a mountain so
that he can see the world from the immensely long temporal perspective in which
change takes place over eons. [Tolkien
employs a somewhat analogous trick in his representation of the language of the
Ents.]
As I was walking this morning – up to Contrescarp along rue
Descartes, down rue Mouffetard, up again to Place d’Italie, back down Avenue
des Gobelins, and home along rue Monge –I found myself thinking of that episode
as a metaphor for the difference between being a philosopher and being a
blogger. Although even as a philosopher
I do not really view things sub specie
aeternitatis, I do try to stand back from the quicksilver changes of the
moment and achieve what I might call a Rocky Mountain or Himalayan point of
view. But as a blogger, I am virtually compelled
to attend to the moment, reacting – and of course having an opinion about – the
events of the past twenty-four hours.
This morning, surfing the Web, I find that a young White woman
heading up the Spokane, Washington branch of the NAACP has misrepresented
herself as African-American. I also
learn that tomorrow Jeb Bush will at long last formally announce his candidacy
for the Republican Presidential nomination.
Each of these news items falls within one or another of the areas in which
I claim to have, if not expertise, at least strong opinions, but I cannot for
the life of me think of anything witty or arresting, let alone profound, to say
about either of them. I have already
explained the origin of the clown car trope to my overseas readers, so that
disposes of the Bush story, and there really is no deeper meaning to the NAACP
curiosity.
Sometimes I envy the wife of a New England whaling captain
who would write a letter, give it to a ship about to sail, and hope that at some
point in the next year and a half the letter would be passed by bosun’s chair
to the ship carrying her husband.
She could really take her time thinking of something to say.
Amy Schumer (whoever she is) had a provocative "tweet" on the fake black person:
ReplyDelete"Wait, we can be black if we want?" Too bad James Baldwin isn't around to "tweet."
I'm sure he would have some good ones. If anyone wishes to watch him expose William F.
Buckley as a racist, in a debate at Harvard, go here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFeoS41xe7w
http://afroculinaria.com/2015/06/12/cutting-to-the-white-meat-the-real-issue-with-rachel-dolezal/
ReplyDeleteGood one David; I'll change that to "white black person."
ReplyDelete