I have led a quiet, protected, uneventful life, or so it has
seemed to me. I was born into a stable
middle-class family that was virtually unaffected either by the Great
Depression or by the Second World War. I
pursued a conventional educational path leading, with no more than the usual
uncertainties, to a tenured professorship at the age of thirty. My military service, such as it was, occurred
during one of those rare moments when the United States was not at war, and though
I had some measure of success as an academic and as an author, I did not even
quite rise to the level, in Mel Brooks’ classic phrase, of being “world famous
in Poland.” My first series of video’ed
lectures, On Ideological Critique, had a quite modest success, drawing more
viewers than I had ever seen in a classroom but, judging by the other YouTube
clips, so few as not even to be worth taking note of. Under these circumstances, it was quite easy
for me to assure myself that I cared a great deal more about being a good
teacher and a clear writer than I did about achieving even a fleeting moment of
fame, let alone the fifteen minutes that Andy Warhol had promised. I compared myself to M. de St. Colombe,
playing his viola da gamba for hours on end in a little wooden shack, oblivious
to the attractions of Versailles.
Then I began my current series of lectures on the Critique of Pure Reason, and quite
inexplicably, they drew thousands of views on YouTube. In a matter of weeks, my carefully cultivated
façade of spiritual purity crumbled, and I found myself anxiously checking the
tally of views of each lecture. The
crash of the viewership for the sixth lecture sent me into John Bunyan’s Slough
of Despond. I found myself crying pathetically,
like Marlon Brandon in the taxi with Rod Steiger, “I coulda been a contender; I
coulda been somebody!”
Fortunately, a long-time reader sent me an email message, in
which he recalled me to myself. Here is
what he wrote, in part: “Your job is to
speak to those who remain. I would remind you that you have mentored
individuals, giving them hours of your time. Do not get snagged on the
“popularity” nettle.”
I realized that he was right, and returning to my hut,
picked up my viola da gamba, (all of which was made easier, needless to say, by
the fact that there was then a sharp uptick in the views of Lecture Six.)
I was wondering about your remark that Kant's argument for the causal maxim is the heart of the Critique. What about his analysis of our peculiar fate? I mean our fate to use the categories in a way that appears to yield knowledge of things in themselves, but doesn't? I would think that having devoted as much mental energy to the phenomenon of ideological illusion as you have, you would think that the doctrine of transcendental illusion is at least as important as the argument concerning causality. If not the heart, perhaps the liver. For someone who so often begins with a reference to this or that item within the critical ediface, why has the analysis of transcendental illusion seemed to be sidelined in your relections on Marx, ideology, Freud, and other matters?
ReplyDeleteAn explanation for the dropoff in viewers? Are you kidding? The Critique is tough sledding! Or was, 56 years ago when I thought I was kind of smart. Can't even imagine doing it today, when my toughest critique is whether to poach or bake the salmon.
ReplyDelete"Still govern thou my Song, Urania, and fit audience find, though few." - John Milton, Paradise Lost
ReplyDeleteI'd be curious about the perspective of contemporary neuroscience on some of the questions Kant was dealing with (according to the sixth lecture), re what physical objects are and how they are perceived, and so on. (Not that I know much of anything about neuroscience.)
ReplyDelete[Also tempted to say something about your last point re Kant's ethics, but I won't, at least for the moment.]
Professor Wolff, I must say that I find it oddly heartening that somehow as wise as you would worry about something as silly as how many 'views' you have on YouTube.
ReplyDeleteFor "somehow", read "someone" in the comment above.
ReplyDeleteAnd then there are those of us who wish only that we actually had something interesting to say about the Kant lectures. I mean, Kant on YouTube??? Getting hundreds if not thousands to watch a heavy duty lecture on Kant in the age of clicking for pleasure is at the level of landing humans on mars. Plus you have a Wikipedia entry. Geez Louise! (That's the best I can do in terms of tossing in foreign phrases.)
ReplyDeleteI know you hate the word, but I will use it again: crossover (think analytic proposition:)). It wouldn't take much. Just send in one of your blogs on the campaign to the Huffintonpost and the number of your YouTube viewers will spike. I mean, the line "M. de St. Colombe, playing his viola da gamba for hours on end in a little wooden shack, oblivious to the attractions of Versailles" would be enough to send hundreds to the subscription page.
Professor, just a reminder from the internet that your life certainly seems anything but ordinary or quiet-- meeting great name philosophers and teaching at hugely prestigious universities and producing things on the side... Not everyone gets such an interesting hand dealt to them. I won't preach for stoicism, but perhaps it's a good time to reread his fortune-cookie manual and remember what he said about being a philosopher.
ReplyDeleteGiven the difficulty of the material, I'm taking full advantage of the fact that your videos can be viewed at any time by following along at a slower and more manageable pace. I'd be surprised if I'm the only one who has neither given up yet nor been ready for each week's lecture as soon as their posted.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteCYBERLORD7714@gmail.com is a professional hacker that specializes in exposing cheating spouse,and every other hacking related issues. he helps catch cheating spouse by hacking their communications like call, Facebook, text, emails, Skype and many more. i have used this service before and he did a very good job, he gave me every proof i needed to know that my fiancee was cheating. You can contact him on his email CYBERLORD7714@gmail.com to help you catch your cheating spouse, or for any other hacking related problems, he will definitely help you, he has helped a lot of people, contact him and figure out your relationship status. i wish you the best too.
Are you looking for a reliable and trustworthy hacker then look no further because i know just the right person he helped my sister sloved her marriage case as an private investigator and my friends too.
ReplyDeleteHe also those email proof, facebook hack, credit rating, bank transfer, whatsapphack and so much more. Contact him: theblackhacker19@gmail. Com
This article is quite interesting and I am looking forward to reading more of your posts. Thanks for sharing this article with us.
ReplyDeleteScience Assignment Writing Help