I wrote In Defense of
Anarchism when I was thirty-one [though it was not published until five
years later.] It was a youthful work,
full of insouciant bravado. How apt were
Wordsworth’s lines, “Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive/But to be young was
very heaven.” The argument of my little tract
was so simple that it could have been stated in a short paragraph with room
left over for embellishment. Further
along in the text, I drew on Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s famous critique of English
representative democracy to break a lance for something I imagined as
television democracy [“The people of England deceive themselves when they fancy
they are free; they are so, in fact, only during the election of members of parliament:
for as soon as a new one is elected, they are again in chains, and are
nothing. And thus, by the use they make
of their brief moments of liberty, they deserve to lose it.”]
Television democracy rested on the conviction that men and
women, offered the opportunity to give direct legislative expression to their desires
and convictions, could be relied on to inform themselves, vote their interests,
and set aside irrational hatreds and anxieties.
It is more than half a century since I wrote that tract, and
in this terrible election season, I am forced to reflect that it is perhaps
Yeats rather than Wordsworth to whom I must look for guidance.
And what rough beast, its hour come
round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
3 comments:
It is apparent and unfortunate that so many here lack either the ability or ambition to do any of those three things.
There are a lot of points between the extremes of Wordsworth and Yeats, and I would bet that we're somewhere in between the two. Business as usual will go on being business as usual.
"insouciant bravado" - great description, should be a tempo marking.....
Rosseau's critique sounds a bit like Marx in On the Jewish Question.
Post a Comment