I am going to stop blogging about Mueller and what he did or did not find. It should be obvious that I have no first-hand knowledge, and people I like and enjoy communicating with on this blog have dramatically different views on the matter. Inasmuch as I cannot do anything at all to affect the course or outcome of the affair, and I since I do not enjoy fighting with my friends, I am going to move on. In due course, we will see. Or we won't. Whatever.
There is one point I would like to make that I think is important. For whatever reason, the election of Trump triggered a massive surge in ground level organizing and protest that started with the Women's March the day after Inauguration, which I attended, and which continues unabated to the present day. That energy has led unprecedented numbers of women to run for office at local, state, and national levels. It has produced a series of by-election upsets and a big blue wave in 2018. Although many of those elected ran on moderate platforms [and would not, in my judgment, have been elected had they not], a number of dramatically progressive candidates have emerged, and the national debate about policy has moved sharply leftward for the first time in several generations. The media frenzy about the Mueller investigation has not, so far as I can tell, derailed or diverted that movement, and it gives no sign of doing so now.
In the presence of this movement, the best thing for all of us to do is to join it, donate to it, work for it, cheer it on, and hope it is enough both to defeat Trump and to elect legislators committed to enacting progressive legislation.
All else is persiflage, to the effusion of which I am on this blog a leading contributor. No more.
Now, about Duke and Zion Williamson ...
Amen. The left wing sledge hammer (and sickle anyone?) has always been the much needed answer to Trumpism. Of course left wing hammers are never covered by centrist media entities.
ReplyDeleteNot about Duke and Zion, but some people here might find this review of William Edmundson's recent book (which has been mentioned briefly from time to time on this blog, though not really discussed) to be of interest: https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/john-rawls-reticent-socialist/ It doesn't go in to everything that's of interest in the (pretty short) book, but gives a pretty good account of what's interesting in it (and also, I think, some of the same worries that I've had about the theoretical, as oppposed to the biographical, argument.)
ReplyDeleteMatt,
ReplyDeleteThanks for that link.