On this lazy Sunday morning, I thought I would say just a
word about the term “ward heeler” and its connection to a very large change in
American politics that took place after World War II. In the late 19th
and early 20th century, an enormous number of people from Europe
emigrated to the United States and many of them settled in large eastern and
midwestern cities – Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, New York, and so forth. They
tended to settle in linguistic, national, and ethnic neighborhoods – Italian,
Irish, German, Polish, and Russian. The new immigrants by and large did not
speak English and in the Catholic churches that sprang up, although of course
the mass was still celebrated in Latin, the sermons were in the language of the
neighborhood. In those days, a mixed marriage, a source of much agita to the
parents, might be the union of a young Italian Catholic boy with a young Irish Catholic
girl.
The city governments were organized into wards and quite
often run by political machines whose low-level neighborhood operatives walked
the wards saying hello to the folks they met and doing necessary favors for
them – arranging for an ordinance to be waived, facilitating permission to hang
a sign outside of a saloon, and so on. When election day rolled around, those
for whom favors had been done were expected to respond by giving their votes to
the machine candidate. Since these political operatives walked “on their heels”
they were called ward heelers. Typically, the big city machines were allied
with the Democratic Party and it was the proud boast of the machine boss that
he could “deliver” his territory to a state or national candidate when called
upon to do so. One of the last of the big city bosses was Richard Daley of
Chicago. I can still recall, late on election night in 1960, when the vote
total from Illinois had been frozen for hours and the outcome of the election
hung in the balance, until finally Richard Daley “voted the graveyards” as the
saying had it and threw Illinois to Kennedy, giving him the presidency.
After World War II, there was a massive movement of the more
affluent city residents to the suburbs and even the exurbs, facilitated by the
automobile and eventually by the creation of the interstate highway system. The
explicit written federal guidelines for government guaranteed mortgages
discriminated against nonwhite applicants with the consequence that the suburbs
became all white. The white middle-class and upper-middle-class suburbanites no
longer needed the small favors from the local city government that had been the
meat and potatoes of the old political machines. Instead, sitting in their segregated enclaves beyond the city limits, they issued a call for “good government”
which in practice meant government that attended to the economic needs of the
upper-middle-class. The inner cities became ghettos, heavily black, and with
the departure of the affluent city residents, the sources of funds for city
government began to dry up. The machines remained in some form or other but
were taken over by black politicians who eventually succeeded in electing some
of their own to city government.
All of that and a great deal more is contained in the old
term “ward heeler.”
I notice that you leave out the Jews among immigrant groups which settled in big cities in urban ghettos and developed political machines. We (the Jews) did it exactly the same way as the Italians and Irish and "made it" in the same way they did too.
ReplyDeleteYes, I know. My grandfather was one of them. I was giving examples, not an exhaustive list.
ReplyDeleteTrue story: When my Irish Catholic mother and my Protestant father decided in the 1930s to get married, both families were upset. As my mother related it to me, her father was particularly upset. How could his daughter marry a Protestant? My grandmother was very religious, superstitiously religious—sprinkling holy water around the house during a storm to ward off the lightening. She also kept a framed picture of the Pope in the living room. As the kitchen table discussion was continuing, and as my grandfather was getting more and more upset, my grandmother consoled him by observing, “It could be worse. She could be marrying an Italian.” She made this observation without any apparent thought of the ethnicity of the guy whose picture she kept in the living room.
ReplyDeleteI was in Chicago for the 1960 election. I don’t remember the exact numbers, but the political pundits said that Kennedy would have to go out of Cook County with a margin of something like 50,000 votes to carry the State. In fact, he carried the county by a much, much larger margin, something like 150,000. But the election nevertheless was a cliff-hanger. So mystery number one was where did Kennedy get all of those extra votes? Mystery number two was where did the suburban and down-state Republicans get the votes to keep it close after the Democrats had stolen so many in Cook County? Illinois is a serious challenger to Louisiana for the title of Most Corrupt State Government. It seems like half the governors since Adlai Stevenson have gone to jail—Rod Blogojevich being the latest I can recall. How could the poor guy know that people would be upset if he tried to sell the appointment to fill Obama’s seat in the Senate?
I appreciate your frankness. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteAh, David, the good old days. :)
ReplyDeletemight be relevant, then, to discourse upon the 'new' term *sanctuary cities*..
ReplyDeleteVery slightly related, but fascinating:
ReplyDeleteThe Old New York Page 1908
150 humorists honored Mark Twain and HH Rogers in a beefsteak dinner at Reisenweber's Cafe (987 8th Ave). Reisenweber's Hotel stood near Columbus Circle [ picture here
Beefsteaking emerged as a popular tradition in 1880s New York City, typically for civic or political fundraisers, offering unlimited steak and unlimited beer. No utensils. Hands were washed with beer, wiped on a personalized butcher's apron.
The steak was served in butter and drippings on bread. The slices of bread were not eaten but rather stacked to count how many steaks got eaten.
In 1939, Joseph Mitchell noted 2 New York schools of beefsteaking.
The East Side School was pioneered by William Wertheimer and Son meat market (339 1st Ave), still open in 1978. No appetizers or fish were served, just beef tenderloin, hamburger steak & kidneys served on day-old bread (never toast).
The West Side School was pioneered by African American chef Bob Ellis of Hollings Beefsteak Keller in the basement of 1860-built Terminal Hotel (11th Ave and 23rd St), which still stands. In the 1890s, he cooked beefsteaks on hickory embers, served on toast with appetizers (radishes, potatoes, and crab cakes),
It was primarily a men-only event until 1920 and waned in popularity in the 1930s. Women were included after the 18th and 19th Amendments were passed, altering the menu with salads and fruit cups added. Cocktails replaced beer during Prohibition (1920-1933).
German brass bands and storytellers were replaced by orchestras and eventually utensils were added. Beefsteaking had more dining etiquette in its final New York years.
Beefsteaking originally started among working-class men mid-1800s, sitting on crates and barrels in beefsteak dungeons (steaks cellars), wearing butcher's aprons. Theodore Roosvelt participated in beefsteaking in the dungeon of Zangheri's, (17 E 22nd St).
Steaks were dipped in butter cooked on hickory embers, served with triangular slices of bread and celery stalks. This tradition later got adopted 1880s in banquets of wealthy men.
Beeksteakng in NYC has since mostly. disappeared except for a few events, including biannual beefsteaking in Brooklyn. The tradition spread to Bergen and Passaic counties in New Jersey where it is still active.
Apropos of not this post, you’re in a philosophy comic: https://existentialcomics.com/comic/350?fbclid=IwAR3i6PYWoTk7wch9gkUg58LkCWKLWmgiEBWbRwWs5aN37DFv2hOo2HQnqJI
ReplyDeleteOK, I have finally made it! Now, if a rapper would only rap about me. :)
ReplyDelete