I. General Explanation
These estimates are keyed to the Green Papers, a detailed
specification of the rules governing the several state primaries. I omit caucuses, which take place in fifteen of
the states and territories, because I do not understand the rules governing
them well enough to make any estimates.
The numbers in the Green Papers have changed since I began
this effort. Originally, they stated
that 2484 delegates would be sent to the Convention in July. Now they say there will be 2472. I have no idea what happened to the other twelve. As of now, it will require 1237 votes at the
Convention to choose a nominee. The
Green Papers still list 1865 as the delegates to be chosen by primaries and
caucuses, which leaves 607 so-called "super-delegates."
What is more, the rules in some states have
changed since I last read them!
Sheeesh!!! Therefore, this
exercise will yield different results.
II. Assumptions
This
exercise is not intended to produce
a prediction of the outcome. It is a calculation of the likely result
given certain assumptions. Here are the
assumptions on which the calculation is based:
(a) Fairly quickly,
the race reduces to a three way contest among Trump, Cruz, and Rubio, with several
other candidates remaining in the race but garnering, among them, no more than
20% of the total vote.
(b) Trump gets a
steady 35-40% of the vote.
(c) Cruz and Rubio
between them get 40-50% of the vote, with neither getting as high as 30% save
in one or two states.
(d) Few if any of the
super-delegates will vote for Trump at the Convention, so if he is to get the
nomination, he must win the 1237 delegates in the primaries and caucuses, which
is to say 66.4% of them.
III. Important facts
(a) The Republican
National Committee allocates 3 delegates to a state for each Congressional
District [CD], plus some number of delegates-at-large.
(b) The elected
delegates are pledged to a candidate and must vote for him or her on the first ballot
at the Convention. The super-delegates
are unpledged [at least in some cases!!!
But see South Carolina.] and may
vote for anyone [I think this is true, but the Green Papers are unclear.]
IV. Abbreviations
(a) WTA =
Winner takes all. The highest
vote getter wins all of the delegates selected in a primary.
(b) WTM =
Winner takes most. A delegate
allocation system that gives some delegates to the second and even third place
finishers in a primary but allocates an out-sized proportion to the candidate
getting the most votes. For example, in
each CD, a state may award 2 of the delegates to the top vote getter in that CD
and 1 to the second-place vote getter.
The at-large delegates may be allocated proportionally to the vote getters
in the state who get 20% or more of the total vote. [This is quite common. Note that if Trump gets 40%, Cruz gets 25%,
and Rubio gets 20%, then Trump gets 47% of the at-large delegates, because 40%
is 47% of 85%.]
(c) PROP =
genuine proportional allocation of delegates according to the popular
vote. Very few states use this system,
but New Hampshire, the first primary, does.
With all that said, here is the spreadsheet information:
State | Pledged Delegates | Likely Trump | % of Total | System |
New Hampshire | 20 | 7 | 35.0% | PROP |
South Carolina | 50 | 41 | 82.0% | WTM |
Alabama | 47 | 32 | 68.1% | WTM |
Arkansas | 37 | 14 | 37.8% | PROP |
Georgia | 76 | 40 | 52.6% | WTM |
Massachusetts | 39 | 14 | 35.9% | PROP |
Okalahoma | 40 | 20 | 50.0% | WTM |
Tennessee | 55 | 28 | 50.9% | WTM |
Texas | 152 | 86 | 56.6% | WTM |
Vermont | 16 | 6 | 37.5% | PROP |
Virginia | 46 | 17 | 37.0% | PROP |
Louisiana | 44 | 16 | 36.4% | PROP |
Idaho | 29 | 10 | 34.5% | PROP |
Mississippi | 37 | 14 | 37.8% | PROP |
Michigan | 56 | 21 | 37.5% | PROP |
Puero Rico | 20 | 7 | 35.0% | PROP |
Ohio | 63 | 63 | 100.0% | WTA |
Florida | 99 | 99 | 100.0% | WTA |
Illinois | 66 | 25 | 37.9% | |
Missouri | 49 | 34 | 69.4% | WTM |
North Carolina | 72 | 25 | 34.7% | PROP |
Arizona | 58 | 58 | 100.0% | WTA |
Wisconsin | 42 | 30 | 71.4% | WTM |
New York | 92 | 52 | 56.5% | WTM |
Connecticut | 25 | 14 | 56.0% | WTM |
Delaware | 16 | 16 | 100.0% | WTA |
Maryland | 38 | 29 | 76.3% | WTM |
Pennsylvania | 68 | 14 | 20.6% | |
Rhode Island | 16 | 6 | 37.5% | PROP |
Indiana | 54 | 45 | 83.3% | WTM |
West Virginia | 31 | 18 | 58.1% | |
Oregon | 25 | 9 | 36.0% | PROP |
California | 169 | 145 | 85.8% | WTM |
Montana | 24 | 24 | 100.0% | WTA |
New Jersey | 48 | 48 | 100.0% | WTA |
New Mexico | 21 | 8 | 38.1% | PROP |
South Dakota | 26 | 26 | 100.0% | WTA |
Nebraska | 33 | 33 | 100.0% | WTA |
Washington | 41 | 14 | 34.1% | PROP |
1940 | 1208 | 62.3% |
Thanks for doing this! I started to do it myself a month ago but ran out of steam.
ReplyDeleteWhat if Trump gets about 62% of the non-super delegates and does not get the nomination? Surely the Republican Party will go into meltdown?
ReplyDeleteCharles Pigden, I think that is a very real possibility, and you are correct, that will send the Republican Party into chaos. This is going to be a very strange year.
ReplyDelete@Wolff Pretty good job! You do better work than media consultants who are paid too much and dont do anything near this scientific. But why did you leave so many states out? You really have something here. You should finish it. It might be more important than you think...
ReplyDeleteI left out the caucus states because I cannot figure them out.
ReplyDelete