As I have several times observed, the development of modern
social science can be viewed as the progressive taking seriously of spheres of
human experience that were previously ignored as infra dignitate. Economics
treats of the buying and selling of goods in the marketplace, a banausic activity that no gentleman
would contemplate. Anthropology began
when the practices of South Sea Islanders were accorded the respect previously
reserved for the amusements of lords and ladies, and graced with the epithet “culture.” Durkheim launched Sociology with a detailed
analysis of the phenomenon of suicide.
Freud created an entire medical specialty out of such detritus of human
experience as dreams, jokes, and slips of the tongue. And modern literary critics, weary of their
endless contemplation of Greek tragedy and Romantic poetry, turned their attention
first to that middle class amusement, the novel, then to movies, which were
rechristened “films,” and finally even to such ephemera as television and comic
books.
I have always admired this ability to – as my old friend
Esther Terry would say – make chicken salad from chicken shit, but alas, I lack
the gift. Thus it is that the endless
contemplation of the Trump presidency, rather than inspiring me to flights of
creative imagination, has had the effect of making me stupid.
In an effort to recapture the life of the mind, I have
decided to offer a short series of lectures on The Thought of Sigmund Freud, to
be delivered – if they agree – at UNC and preserved for eternity on
YouTube. The arrangements are still
being explored, but my hope is to record the lectures in March and April. Later in this sesquicentennial year, I plan
to mount a more extended series on The Thought of Karl Marx.
Excellent. Best wishes, Prof., in these endeavors!
ReplyDeleteFreud, great!
ReplyDeleteI read through most of what I could find in paperback of Freud about 20 years ago, and I learned a lot about myself and others.
I'm looking forward to your lectures.
I look forward to both, particularly to Marx. I've never studied him at all systematically--just reading the Communist Manifesto and selections on the Portable Marx. When I was in high school and college in the 1950s, no school I attended dared mention his name lest Joe McCarthy or HUAC come calling.
ReplyDeleteI too am looking forward to those lectures. I think you also should take a look at,
ReplyDeleteThe Question of God: C.S. Lewis and Sigmund Freud Debate God, Love, Sex, and the Meaning of Life
by Armand M. Nicholi Jr. It's a fascinating book by one of Harvard's finest professors.
Very excited!
ReplyDeleteHappen to have on my shelf an old paperback -- B. Nelson, ed., Freud and the Twentieth Century (Meridian Books, 1957). From a short piece in that collection by Abraham Kaplan, "Freud and Modern Philosophy":
ReplyDelete"Freud is not so much a pessimist as a realist, possibly the most thoroughgoing realist in western thought." (p.229)
Reproducing that sentence and the word "discuss" would make a great final exam question in some course or other.
---
p.s. "Banausic" is a nice, rather underused English word. I had to look it up in the dictionary to remind me of the derivation and meanings.
Do you need free Twitter Followers?
ReplyDeleteDid you know you can get these ON AUTOPILOT & ABSOLUTELY FOR FREE by getting an account on Like 4 Like?