When I began blogging eight years ago, I was quite
unprepared for the Internet’s insatiable craving for content. I was accustomed to sitting quietly in my
study, unhurried and unharried, writing another book. Only when a book was completed would I
venture into the public square to publish what I had written. Because I had all but died to the world, no
longer attending professional meetings or giving invited talks, I felt no
pressure to produce.
In 2009, my pen had been silent for almost two decades, save
for a short book about my experiences in UMass’s Afro-American Studies
Department, the endless new editions of a textbook written in the ‘70s, and the
unpublished first volume of my autobiography.
But with the announcement of The Philosopher’s Stone, I launched into a
frenzy of writing on all manner of things, posting my words for all to read
virtually as they were written. Over the
next two or three years, I wrote about Marx and I wrote about Freud. I wrote about Kant, and I wrote about
Hume. I wrote about Kierkegaard, about
Mannheim, about Durkheim, about Erich Auerbach, about Emily Dickinson. I wrote on line an entire book about Rational
Choice Theory, Game Theory, and Collective Choice Theory. I even wrote about myself, completing and
posting daily the second and third volumes of my autobiography.
When I looked up from my keypad, I discovered that I had unwittingly
become committed to an endless production of daily short essays, asides, and
animadversions at the passing scene. If
I failed to post something for two or three days, I would get worried messages
from friends and family: “Are you all
right?”
I am reminded of Kierkegaard’s ironic and mocking remark in
the Preface to The Philosophical Fragments,
a work to which I return repeatedly: “It
is not given to everyone to have his private tasks of meditation and reflection
so happily coincident with the public interest that it becomes difficult to
judge how far he serves merely himself and how far the public good.”
For most of my life, words have flowed from me almost unbidden. I leave it to others to judge whether they
emanate from a bubbling spring or a suppurating wound. But lately, the endless horrors of the world
threaten to make me run dry. Oh, I
imagine I shall continue to blog. After
all, I seem to have no difficulty finding something to say about the fact that
I have nothing to say. But the joy threatens
to leave me. In my earlier days, it was
different. As Wordsworth said of the French
Revolution, “Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive/But to be young was very
heaven.”
Perhaps I should say something about jigsaw puzzles.
9 comments:
Blogging can become a chore if one feels an obligation to produce something every day or even every week.
One way to deal w this is to announce that you will be posting less frequently from now on, and then give an interval (roughly once every 3 weeks, or whatever -- once every 6 weeks, whatever you settle on). Then people will only become concerned about your well-being if you fail to post at the previously announced interval.
This may result in some slight reduction in page views or casual readers, but the regular readers of the blog will not go away. Bloggers deal w this whole issue in various ways: some encourage readers to use RSS feeds (I've never used them), others allow readers sign up for an email alert whenever the blog has new content, etc.
When I was blogging (which I no longer do), I occasionally used my blog as a sort of commonplace bk, posting quotes from whatever bk or piece I happened to be reading. That's not really 'saying' much of anything beyond "this passage caught my eye," but it is one way of using a blog.
But there is little point in posting just for the sake of it. Post when you have something to say; most of the readers will not have left, I think. That's my two cents; others' views may differ.
p.s. This summer I read a classic (i.e., 'canonical') novel that I'd never read before. Despite the fact that there is so much secondary lit. on its author that one cd prob. never go through it all (unless that were one's full-time job), if I were still blogging I'm sure I cd get a post or two out of having read the bk, if only to mention a striking passage or two.
How about a weekly column? Readers will then click on your website, say, every Wednesday. You'll have a week to think of a topic, write a first draft, polish it, etc.
Professor Wolff,
I think your blog is just wonderful. THANK YOU!
Your other readers are much less demanding than I am. They are probably much smarter and nicer also. I fully expect to be educated, enlightened, and entertained by your writings- for free- at least two or three times a week. Anything less than that is simply unacceptable.
I haven't quite figured out what 'unacceptable' means in this context other than I just don't like it, so don't consider that any kind of threat or anything. I have a lawyer friend who used the term fairly often, and it actually usually sounded reasonable when he said it. He was stumped the time I replied "so what?" though. Just as long as you don't think of something like that then the statement possibly has some meaning...
Maybe I will be better off just seconding Trane- "I think your blog is just wonderful. THANK YOU!" That works for me too- Thanks for writing it!
I found your blog because I was curious about Newt Gingrich's dissertation! I think that was five years ago. I hope you keep it up. If you run out of ideas, you could always take requests.
Well-said, bravo!
Nietzsche: Schopenhauer as Educator
Question: can a philosopher really undertake with a good conscience to have something to teach everyday?....And speaking generally: is he not robbing himself of his freedom to follow his genius whenever and wherever it calls him--through being obliged to think in public about predetermined subjects at predetermined hours?....Supposing one day he said to himself: I can't think of anything today, at least not of anything worthwhile--he would still have to present himself and pretend to think!"
What passes for left-wing intelligentsia nowadays is dominated by people who either cannot write English or by the Clintonista wing of the Democrats, often people pushing anti-popular agendas.
They would be an endless source of inspiration for a controversialist.
You are an educated man who likes to write and are able to do it well, with humour and in English. Yet, I have never seen you engaging in any controversy with those sacred cows.
Best Qualified Leads For MCA method has several leading elements needed to modify the MCA Leads Guide to the approaching jobs in the Qualified MCA Leads Data.
Post a Comment