In politics, as in life, luck plays a larger role than we
sophisticated social theorists like to admit.
To give a personal example of luck in life, the particular half century
during which my career played out happened to coincide with a post-war boom in
American higher education helped along by a Cold War that led the US Congress
to pump billions into universities, some of which even slopped over into the
Humanities. As a consequence, those of
us who got in at the beginning of the boom were flooded with jobs and had to
beat off eager commercial house book editors scrounging for publishable
material. To revise an old joke, we were
born with Ph. Ds and thought we were prodigies.
Those of my father’s generation were not so lucky. In high school, I had a number of teachers
with Ph. Ds who never did find a university job. These days, young men and women quite as
talented as we were are forced to get by on part time gigs while struggling to
pay off student loans I never had to take out.
These reflections are prompted by the events of the past
several weeks, which seem to show that Donald Trump’s luck has run out. After three weeks or more spent escalating
his racist White Supremacist rhetoric, he was hit with El Paso and Dayton in
less than twelve hours. Whatever we may
say about the deep rooted connections between Trump’s embrace of White Racist Nationalism
and a rise in xenophobic violence, there is obviously no direct nexus between
Trump’s speeches and the Texas/Ohio violence.
But the violence coming on the heels of the speeches has materially
changed the political landscape. It was
just bad luck for him. The same attacks,
spread out over a space of several months, would have had a totally different political
effect.
It is enough to give an atheist like me pause.
By the way, I am saddened to say that Joe Biden’s speech in
response to the killings was a totally successful political moment for him. Sanders and Warren are going to have to up
their game.
'In politics, as in life, luck plays a larger role than we sophisticated social theorists like to admit.'
ReplyDeleteI suppose that's being a bit facetious. Because, 'sophisticated social theorist' is hard to take seriously, like if you put if on your business card. I am not sure that I have ever encountered the locution before. Sounds like a garden party of the Frankfort School for Social Research. Marcuse was there. I was there. But I'm losing my edge..