Today’s theme on the cable news talk shows is that we are
now 100 days from the election. The talking heads are called on to speculate
how the present day polls – so disastrous for Trump – may change over those 100
days. There is endless repetition of the banal observation that anything can
happen 100 days. But no one seems to talk about what is certain to happen in
the next 30 days so I’ll spend little time repeating what I have said here
before.
Four things are sure to happen in the next 30 days and all
of them will be disastrous for Trump. First, in less than a week 20 or 30
million Americans or perhaps more will be faced with eviction from their homes
for nonpayment of rent or they will be faced with repossession of their houses
for nonpayment of mortgages. This is a catastrophe of unimaginable dimensions
and even if the Republicans can be persuaded to extend support payments and
eviction delays in a new congressional support bill, their internal
disagreements and consequent dillydallying ensure that before they can act
millions of Americans will be displaced and made homeless.
The second thing that is going to happen, this time in 2 ½
weeks, is that the Republicans will put on some sort of half-assed nominating
convention in Charlotte North Carolina or somewhere else at which Trump will be
renominated. The event will be a shambles and will most certainly not produce a
characteristic bump in the polls that past experience has taught us to expect
from political conventions.
The third thing that will happen, or rather will continue to
happen, is that the number of total confirmed virus cases will grow day by day
and the number of total deaths will grow day by day and this will happen in red
states as well as in blue states, and battleground states as well as in states
that are not genuinely in contention in the forthcoming election. Since Trump
is president, he will get the credit or in this case the blame.
Finally, the fourth thing that will happen – possibly the
politically most consequential of all – is that some time in the next 30 days
50 million public elementary, middle school, and high school students will be
faced with the prospect of returning to school in some form or other. If one
adds to them their parents, their non-college-age brothers and sisters, their
teachers, and their teachers’ immediate families, a total of perhaps 100
million Americans will be directly, unavoidably, and terrifyingly compelled to
decide how to manage school this fall.
By the time these four developments play out, the election
will be 60 or 70 days away, not 100 days, and early voting will be weeks away
from starting. We must do everything in our power to run up the vote at every
point on the ticket as much as possible and, of course, we must fight voter
suppression and outright voter fraud as vigorously as we can, but I simply do
not see how the Republicans can avoid a crushing defeat. The only downside to
all of this is that when they finally have finished counting all the votes, not
on November 3 but perhaps a week or two later, and the Democrats have taken the
presidency, the house, and the Senate, we will be left with Joseph Biden as our
president. But you can’t have everything. Sufficient unto the day.
10 comments:
Since you begin with the polls, maybe this will prove helpful to some:
https://www.cjr.org/special_report/our-polling-trauma.php
The machinery of eviction and repossession requires a bureaucracy to administer it (just like everything else). This bureaucracy can only do its grisly job if it is not overloaded and the number of repossessions and evictions remains below ceiling of manageability. Will it be physically and administratively possible to evict 20 to 30 million American in a few weeks? Surely not. There will be a spike in evictions and an increase in homelessness with plenty of tales of desolation and despair, but most of the potential evictees will remain in their homes whilst their landlords and mortgage companies spiral towards financial disaster.
A month old, but another Prof Wolff's thoughts on the pandemic and economy: "Professor Richard Wolff: The coming economic crash will be like NOTHING in history"
https://youtu.be/5vCc20i2aco
Here in Texas, early voting starts in 78 days.
Larry McCullough
Austin, Texas
A more recent (July 15) interview with Professor Richard Wolff: "Coming Economic Crash Will be WORSE Than Great Depression"
https://youtu.be/14zbZvXogoM
The NY Times reports that the Trump campaign has pulled its ads in Michigan:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/29/us/politics/michigan-trump-biden-2020.html
I know it's premature, but the tune that keeps popping into my head is "Happy Days are Here Again."
'in less than a week 20 or 30 million Americans or perhaps more will be faced with eviction from their homes for nonpayment of rent or they will be faced with repossession of their houses for nonpayment of mortgages' Well, but how many actually live in households that missed their last rent payment? Not 20 or 30 million, not even 12 million. We might still find ourselves pondering what averting an eviction crisis in the coming months will require, but evictions are not only expensive for tenants, they're expensive for landlords and municipalities. I thought I had read about negotiations on the next federal relief package beginning in earnest. Noting a planned August recess, time is in short supply for Congress to get a package completed, but you can't be serious that 'millions of Americans will be displaced and made homeless'. I neglect the matter of how often it seems to me that you can't be serious.
This Guardian article supports Professor Wolff's point about tenant evictions in California at least. Landlords are not going through the courts, but cutting off electricity or hot water or changing the lock on the door, etc. The article speaks of a tsunami of evictions.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/30/california-covid-19-evictions-landlords-tenants
That sucks, but not all States are CA (thankfully, for once!) E.g., in my home State of MN it is illegal for landlords to change a lock or discontinue utilities.
I note, just in case it's hard to guess that such a reaction is likely, how 'The Guardian' is known to often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words to favor liberal causes. By 'loaded words', I mean wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes. Worse, is their mixed record for factual reporting. And again, just in case it's not redundant for me to say so. I could rephrase, perhaps, about what is 'known', but only to make my point clear. Put it this way, that The Guardian's target audience used to be adults.
Post a Comment