Well, the government is shut down, the days are painfully
short, I am on hold until Susie and I go to Paris on January 3rd, so
having nothing better to do I surfed the web and located a complete text of the
famous Steele Dossier. I read it all,
from start to finish, working past the occasional strings of typos which I
recognized as a consequence of the document having been scanned into a word
processing program. You can find it here.
I was prompted to engage in this bit of background research
by the news that evidence has surfaced confirming the dossier’s claim that
Michael Cohen met with Russian agents in Prague. Apparently his cellphone pinged off a Prague
cellphone tower. [Stop for a moment to
contemplate how many terabytes of data must exist in the cloud for that fact to
be discoverable! It is astonishing.]
Keep in mind what this document is. It is a report by Steele of raw
intelligence. Steele makes no attempt at
any point to evaluate the data, to argue for or against its accuracy, and
certainly not to estimate its significance.
Nor does he organize it into a coherent story. The dossier is a series of discrete reports
of what he has been told by sources. I
am not going to try to summarize the dossier, because inevitably that will make
it appear that I am endorsing it, vouching for it, and I have absolutely no
basis whatsoever for doing that. I urge
you to take the time to read it yourself.
Thus far, portions of the dossier have
been confirmed in detail by Mueller’s indictments, and none of its reports have been disconfirmed. I do in fact believe
those indictments, but that is just me.
Two things struck me
in the dossier, one potentially very big, one small. Big first. One of Steele’s informants asserts that the
Cohen meeting in Prague [confirmed by the cell phone ping] was for the purpose
of arranging payments from Trump to the hackers. If that is ever confirmed, it is game
over. The small bit is that twice in the
dossier Jill Stein is identified as someone the Russians were using to try to
weaken Clinton’s election chances. It is
also claimed that the Russian IT team were targeting young educated Bernie supporters
in an attempt to use their dislike for Clinton to get them either to vote for
Trump, vote for Stein, or just not vote.
Inasmuch as Mueller has had this document for a year, I
suspect we will fairly soon learn what more, if anything, he has been able to
confirm of its reports.
25 comments:
For a legal analysis of the dossier, see LawFare:
https://www.lawfareblog.com/steele-dossier-retrospective
Though you call it small, the Jill Stein connection was particularly toubling to many democrats based on lengthy online threads about this very topic. It was contentious and polarizing. I doubt if Bernie and the Green Party will ever recover.
There is, isn’t there, a huge difference between someone deliberately conniving with foreign hackers—maybe even paying them to hack—and someone, or some group, e.g., Bernie, Jill Stein, or the Greens, being exploited by such foreign hackers to achieve their ends?
And surely some distinction ought to be drawn between hacking conducted by foreign computer mercenaries and hacking conducted by foreigners acting to try to advance the foreign policy objectives of their own government?
On this last point, I certainly would not be surprised to learn that all governments with the computer capacity/expertise to do so, intervene as best they can in all sorts of political activity in all sorts of countries, and that we’d find it being supported, applauded even, by so many who are outraged when it is done to themselves.
As to the Russian government for its own reasons having it in for Clinton, one would have to be ignorant of the international history of the last 30 years to fail to understand why that would be so.
Thank you so much for the detailed article
Barbara McQuay, former prosecutor with the Eastern District of MI, stated on MSNBC that the ping "doesn't necessarily confirm" that Cohen was in Prague, that eastern European intelligence agencies could be putting out misinformation, and that all of this still has to be "proven." Might the word "suggests" be more appropriate than "confirmed?" What is the likelihood that Eastern European intelligence agencies would play western investigators? Mueller, as yet, hasn't charged Cohen with lying.
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/cohen-again-denies-prague-visit-despite-report-of-intel-evidence-1411355715999
Czech Republic is part of NATO. I would discount McQuay's comment. Why would Czech Republic be interested in disinformation on this point?
For a fairly complete timeline of evidence, I suggest In the Belly of the Beast, at:
https://thelawyerbubble.com/
It was a lot of fun and I truly had a good time reading your post.
I keep on reading your blog post. Thanks a lot for sharing this unique informative post with us.
I am very happy when read this blog post because blog post written in good manner and write on good topic.
Nice to see this beautiful blog! please keep sharing such type of Information.
This article is very nice as well as very informative.
We really appreciate the kind of topics you post here
You have such amazing Lay outs. Thank you very much
Thank you very much for this excellent information.!!! I really appreciated.
I'm looking for a lot of data on this topic.
Thank you for this great article I learn a lot from your article keep it up.
Additionally, thanks for permitting me to comment!
I like to see some other posts on the same subject! Very useful informative info!!
Its enjoyable for me to come here and visit more here. It is terrific post dude.
It is very well written, and your points are well-expressed.
This post is quite informative. I love reading your blogs. Quite helpful.
Your Blog is awesome. Really appreciate your work!
It’s exceptionally useful and you are clearly extremely proficient around there
I really like and appreciate your blog.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.
Post a Comment