I sit here in protected, comfortable isolation, preparing my
Hume lectures, all the while trying to understand what is going to happen to
the world I thought I knew. Because I
spent my entire adult life as a university professor, my attention has been drawn
to the likely impact of the present crisis on that part of the social world. I do not have any knowledge that is not
readily available to all of you, but perhaps my musings will be of interest.
Almost all of the discussion I have seen of the impact of
the virus on universities or colleges has focused on one small corner of the
higher educational world, that occupied by the famous elite schools. This elite school is considering starting the
fall semester early and ending by Thanksgiving so that students will not go
home, get infected, and bring the virus back to campus. That elite school has extended until June 1st
the deadline for admitted applicants to accept admission.
Another elite school is cancelling lectures while hoping to continue
small in-person tutorials. All of the
top schools, despite their bloated endowments, are privately worried that
overseas students, who pay full tuition and do not get financial aid, will stay
home, throwing school budgets into the red.
An old friend who has spent his entire career at Columbia tells me that
31% of Columbia’s students come from overseas, and all of the name schools have
been living large for years off the fees paid by the hordes of students who
come from Mainland China.
But I want to try to think about the impact of the virus on
the schools not in the elite enclave.
One commentator I read remarked at one point that the top schools would
adapt and survive but what about the 1000 schools below them? That comment caught my eye because, in an
effort to be ecumenical, it was so utterly clueless.
Let us remind ourselves of some facts, many of which I have
cited before on this blog.
1. America
has a sharply pyramidal, extremely unequally compensated job structure.
2. A
four year college degree is, more than any other credential or characteristic, the
entrée to the good paying jobs that offer, in addition to good wages, health
care, paid vacations, and
advancement opportunities.
3. Roughly
63% of high school graduates enroll in four year degree granting colleges and university
campuses, and 55% of those actually graduate, so that in the adult population,
roughly 35% have BA’s or equivalent degrees. 65% do
not!!
4. There
are more than 4,600 colleges and university campuses in the United States. Not 8, not 20, not 100, but
4,600! The 1000 schools below the elite 100 are still in the top one-fourth, with another 3500 below them. Every graduate of the least of
these schools is among the favored 35% who can at least have a chance at one of
the good jobs in America. [Forget Bill
Gates. I know he never graduated. In this discussion, he and his ilk are just
shiny objects meant to distract us from the facts.]
5. [Personal
note] A school like UMass Amherst, where
I went to teach for 37 years after resigning my Columbia professorship in 1971,
is not one of the nameless campuses in the hinterlands of the great unwashed. It is an elite school. Why do I say that? Because I am pretty confident that UMass
Amherst would be considered one of the 200 – 250 best colleges or universities
in America, and that would put it in the
top 5%! Indeed, unless you are a
college basketball fan, I would bet you would have a hard time even naming 250
American colleges and university campuses, and if you could, could you also
name a second 200? That would still only
get you to 10% of the total.
Most of the 4,600 institutions of higher education
have small endowments, whether they are public or private. Can they survive a year without their
customary tuition and fee income? What
will happen to them if 30% or more of their students decide to take a gap year
and stay in their parents’ homes? Will
parents be willing to pay the outsized costs of a college education if that
education is delivered on-line to young men and women who never leave home?
Much has been made in the discussions I have seen
of the value of the campus experience, something that is missing from on-line
education. But that experience is
essentially enculturation into a privileged social class rather than a desideratum for intellectual
development. I rather suspect similar
doubts were expressed when the aristocratic tradition of private tutors gave
way to the vulgarity of classrooms.
My guess is that a great many colleges will be
forced to close their doors in the next twelve months, a number of HBCUs among
them. All I can do is sit here, my zoom
skills honed, and offer my services to any college or university, here or
abroad, looking for someone to teach the Philosophy of Hume, the Philosophy of
Kant, the thought of Marx, the elements of formal methods in political theory,
Ideological Critique. Or anything else that comes to mind.
4 comments:
I went to a supposedly elite university and the campus experience was a lot more than "enculturation into a privileged social class", if it was that at all.
My discussions in the dorms or in bars with classmates were a lot more intellectually stimulating than my classroom experience. Many of the books that I read with interest and which marked me, for example, those of Marcuse , those of Nietzsche and those of Sartre, were not assigned in class, but were recommended by classmates or campus friends.
In addition, my campus experience was the beginning of my radical political education, an education that would have been difficult to duplicate in my hometown and even if there are radical videos in Youtube, watching a video is not the same thing as participating in a political group, with meetings, demonstrations, building occupations, etc.
Finally, going to college liberated me from the presence of my parents and was the first step in a long journey towards being me, a journey that I could not begin at home due to family conflicts and pressures.
I continue:
Actually, my university experience was a liberation from an enculturation into a privileged social class, a process which of course only those from a privileged social class can go through and it was that for many of my friends, although not for all of them.
Without being together with intellectual peers and being away from my family, I would not have gone through that process, without tremendous psychological violence to myself and to my family. I had found a few peers by the end of high school among my high school classmates, but we were a small coterie, while in the university I was surrounded by peers and that makes a difference.
Maybe that experience was unique to the 60's, I don't know.
The liberal art wing of my alma mater still hasn't recovered from the last recession. Another effect of that recession was the siphoning off of students from history, philosophy, literature, religious studies, and other humanities majors to business and engineering. Given not only economic precarity but increasingly high tuition, many students feel a sense of safety (however cliched and disproportionate) in more "lucrative" majors. Gotta pay those loans back.
This will happen again in the current recession.
Another factor is the Right's decades-long war on higher education, despite the law and business degrees its upwardly mobile constituents have gained from universities, in many cases, public universities. The dislocations from the pandemic and the readily available justifications for de-funding higher education virtually ensures that this war will escalate.
One of this blog's readers posted a very helpful article a few weeks back. I'll re-post it here since the topic is fresh. BTW, it also goes into, essentially, the political economy of online education. (Recall the discussion RPW initiated a few weeks ago about online education vs. in-person education.)
http://bostonreview.net/forum/jeffrey-aaron-snyder-higher-education-age-coronavirus
The situation of Columbia's reliance on foreign students paying full freight is mirrored in many state schools that rely on out-of-state tuition to make ends meet. The University of Vermont is in this group.
Anonymous may be right regarding the effects of the "dislocations from the pandemic." But that assumes the far right is not a big loser in November. I would bet that the the rise of the fascist right, the pandemic and how it has exposed the idiocy of the right, and the depression may well be the conditions that compel students to turn to the study history, the social sciences and humanities.
Post a Comment