Readers of this blog will, I think, agree that I am an
enthusiastic fan of the more sophisticated reaches of literary criticism. Among
the many terms that I have taken from that field is “intertextuality,” which is
to say, a reference in one work of literature to another work of literature.
Google tells us that “the term was coined in the late 1960s by Julia
Kristeva, who combined ideas from Bakhtin on the social context of language
with Saussure's positing of the systematic features of language.”
For example, Mary Shelley’s famous novel,
Frankenstein, or a Modern Prometheus, is in its title and also in its content
an intertextual reference to a classic figure of Greek mythology. James Joyce’s
most famous novel, Ulysses, is even more directly an intertextual reference to
Homer’s great work. One finds intertextuality in many places, of course,
including the movies. One of my favorite examples is the 1993 movie Sleepless
in Seattle in which Meg Ryan and Rosie O’Donnell watch again and again the
great old romantic movie An Affair to Remember from 1957, starring Cary Grant
and Deborah Kerr. The ending of the Meg Ryan movie revisits and revises the
scene in the earlier film in which Deborah Kerr, rushing to meet Cary Grant at
the top of the Empire State building, is struck by a car and crippled.
My very favorite example of intertextuality, surprising as
this may be, comes from a quite different field of creative effort, namely
television commercials. As I am sure you will know, the Geico ads featuring a
talking gecko were such a great hit that other insurance companies felt it
necessary to up their game. Progressive Insurance hired an actress, Stephanie
Courtney, to play a Progressive saleswoman, Flo. Flo’s great success led Progressive
to branch out and hire a young male actor named Jim Cashman to play an eager,
rather nerdy salesman named Jamie. In one of the Progressive ads featuring
Jamie, he is seen training a group of Progressive salespeople to sing a sales jingle.
Jamie is cruelly demanding and insistent, interrupting them in mid phrase to
criticize them and demand that they sing the ditty more precisely. When I saw
that ad, I was stunned. It was, I thought, the most brilliant piece of
intertextuality I had ever encountered. A little back explanation is required
here.
One of Progressive Insurance’s competitors, Farmers Insurance, hired a well-known character actor named J. K. Simmons, casting him as the
director of a museum of famous and odd Farmers cases. The series of ads with
Simmons all have the same tagline: “We know a thing or two because we’ve seen a
thing or two.” What possible connection can this have to the Progressive ad?
Well, J. K. Simmons won an Oscar as best supporting actor for
the movie Whiplash, in which he plays a sadistic and demanding musical
conductor who drives the main character, a young aspiring drummer, to more
precise performance. The Progressive ad was a graceful and witty homage not to
the Farmers advertisement but to the actor who performed in it.
I do not think James Joyce or Mary Shelley could have done
better.
10 comments:
This guy, two years your junior, made a similar observation:
https://robertpaulwolff.blogspot.com/2018/09/credit-where-credit-is-due.html
Sigh. As Plato, Kant, and Kierkegaard have noted in various ways, since the truth never changes, repetition in the pursuit of true wisdom is inevitable. On the other hand, two years does seem a trifle short. :)
Thank you for this brilliant piece, it's new to me.
How is your reading of Thomas Piketty's Capital and Ideology progressing? You mentioned something about Marx driving a stake through the heart of such arguments. I have stalled half way through, although I found his economic history of the financial compensation to slave owners interesting.I would love to hear more from you on this book.
There are a lot of literary references in Stephen Colbert's monologues and ad libs. He is clearly a devoted LOTR fan and there are plenty of references to Tolkien, but there was one reference (or piece of 'intertextuality') in what I think was an ad lib which I suspect most of his audience will have missed. He was doing a carefully crafted spiel on Trump's tendency to ditch his henchmen and even his family members when the going gets tough. He got to the punchline on which (I suspect) he and his script-writers had laboured long and hard. And then he said twice, seemingly a propos of nothing 'Do it to Julia! Do it to Julia!' Of course this was a reference to the end of Orwell's 1984 and Room 101 in which in order to escape the what for them is the ultimate horror (in Winston Smith's case being eaten alive by rats) the victims in the dungeons of the Party are induced to betray the ones they love the most. It's in this climactic moment that Winston shouts out 'Do it to Julia! ' at which point his psychological destruction as an independent non-Party thinker is complete. I wonder how many people recognised the quote (and why it made sense in context).
I read Orwell's '1984' at some pt but it was a very long time ago and I certainly wd not have recognized the line. Probably a small percentage of Colbert's audience did, though I would not venture a more specific guess.
I would have recognized "Do it to Julia", although I generally don't have a good memory for what I read, probably because deep down I don't give a shit about the life of the mind or even keeping up with what the media have to tell me.
1984 was a book that marked me. I see the "2 minute hate" in practice everyday, not just on the fascist right, but also on the politically correct left.
Observing how the Chilean elite has used the pandemia as a pretext to increase social control,
I more or more see Orwell and Foucault (works like Discipline and Punish) as better guides to how we are ruled and controlled than Marx. More than by a lust for profit, elites seem motivated by a lust for control and domination. Nietzsche is a good guide here too.
On a more mundane level, Queen Elizabeth's recent pandemic speech, "some sunny day" and the same line in Tom Stoppard's "Rock 'n Roll" echoing the recently deceased Vera Lynn's WWII song, "We'll Meet Again."
Replying to Wallerstein: Or Russell - you should check out his Power: A New Social Analysis.
Charles Pigden,
Thank you. Russell on politics is great. His little book, On the Theory and Practice of Bolshevism, is a classic of political thought and analysis, as you well know. He's so perceptive and foresightful. I'll certainly check out the work that you mention.
I don't think of the word 'intertextuality' as being from the more sophisticated reaches of anything, but then again, I don't try to say 'the Anglo-American philosphical tradition with a straight face. On the other hand, it's not as if I'm reading Saussure. That, might actually work as sarcasm. I confess that I've seen all the commercials that you have seen. That, you can take as you will.
Post a Comment